The Serious Drawbacks to Using FLASH for Web Design: Usability, SEO, Editability

March 30, 2009 · 120 comments

Visiting the many golf-related Web sites while doing research for NoBogies is a continual reminder of a major Web design issue commonly seen on business Web sites: using Flash everywhere and especially ONLY using Flash. The only thing I have never figured out is WHY Web designers are doing this in the first place! Perhaps they teach them to do so in college?

I wonder how many companies realize the serious drawbacks and what an extremely poor Web experience Flash sites provide for a very large segment of the Internet-using population? Even among golfers there are bound to be many who simply can not benefit from these types of sites.

Here’s how one exceptional Web Designer and SEO I know replied to my question about whether Flash is still a bad idea:

MikeTek: @GrowMap:  Beyond the usability (which is generally awful) the SEO implications of a full-Flash site can be horrendous.

[NOTE: Mike is the author of an exceptional Web Design SEO blog called UnstuckDigital and offers Web Design and SEO Services. We highly recommend him.]

Instead of reinventing the wheel I will share here what many others have to say about what Flash is good for and why many uses are seriously impacting the effectiveness, usability and find-ability of sites using it incorrectly:

Are you starting to see a pattern here? Here is a short list of the issues covered more extensively in the excellent posts I shared above:

  • Flash requires a proprietary plug-in that DOES NOT work at all on all systems and must be manually loaded on others.
  • No User Accessibility on phones, many PCs, 64 bit operating systems, slower Internet connections, and those with limited bandwidth or who block Flash because they must pay for extra bandwidth.
  • Administrative accessibility: can YOU edit your flash files yourself? What will you do if the person who created the Flash is not available to make changes?
  • Flash is bad for SEO: Most Search Engines do NOT index flash so your site will have poor search engine placement.

If your site is primarily Flash you simply can not reach much of your intended audience. The solution for those who have already invested in a Flash site is to offer an html version of your site and ALWAYS offer a way to bypass the Flash and get to an html page.

Want to see what visitors to your site see? Turn off Flash or use FlashBlockPro. This is what I see when I visit a Web page featuring Flash:

Imagine someone seeing your site as one large image like that or a page with several smaller identical images. How long do you suppose most visitors who only see these images will stay on your site? The only thing worse than a site full of Flash is one that automatically plays music!

NEW: If you already have a Flash site, are a Flash developer or really want to use it you owe it to yourself to read The Truth about Flash Websites and SEO. Mike specifically explains:

“if your website is driven by Flash a non-Flash version should be displayed for browsers without Flash support”

I would add that you should also provide a way to exit any Flash intro and select the html version manually even if your browser DOES support Flash!

NEW: Many Web site owners THINK they really, really want a Flash site. The solution to this issue and some others is to buy them a copy of the book Don’t Make Me Think. Giving one to the decision makers is a good way to get your points across without being confrontational. I’ve heard of consultants giving copies to CEOs, CIOs, or whomever is pushing for a Flash site. Here is more information on it:

*** Don’t Make Me Think by Steven Krug *** Every person involved in the design, creation, ownership or any other aspect of any Web site should own this book. It is simple, concise, to the point, and easy enough for anyone to understand – even people with no Internet or technical background.

You can read a Sample Chapter from the book. Buying a copy of this book for every member of your Team will be the best thing any Web site owner ever did. You’ll never make obvious mistakes again if you keep this book handy! Have a CEO or Owner asking you to make one? Give them this book! [NOTE: Look for the second edition.]

What do YOU think? Let us know in the comments. We use CommentLuv and all comments are dofollow.

More Resources on Web Design and Flash:

WEB DESIGN MISTAKES:

INCREASING CONVERSION RATES:

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Read the Best of GrowMap or Stay In The Loop!

Subscribe to the GrowMap feed via RSS or Email to receive notifications when new posts are published. Follow GrowMap on Twitter too!

{ 113 comments… read them below or add one }

MikeTek March 30, 2009 at 9:59 pm

Twitter: @MikeTek

Thanks for the kind words!

I couldn’t agree more with this post. Flash has an “ooh, ahh” quality that seems to slay many business owners, but it is a usability nightmare – not to mention what a number it can do on your potential to rank for relevant keywords.

I wish every business owner who was sold on a full Flash website would have read this post first.

MikeTek’s last blog post..On Web Marketing & Low-cost Outsourcing

Reply

Web Design Bureau March 31, 2009 at 12:54 am

Thanks for the link. You did a great round up of what the drawbacks of Flash are. As Mike said: every business owner who has been sold a full flash site should have had this post under his/her hand before deciding.

Web Design Bureau’s last blog post..50 monochromatic website designs.

Reply

Tracy March 31, 2009 at 7:17 am

I do lots of sites for photographers and they are some of the worst about wanting lots of flash. Once I finally get them to understand that to have galleries with a CMS they can manage without a webmaster I can usually get them to settle for a flash intro page with a nav menu below for those who do not want to wait for it to load, and seo.

You are right about the music as well. Plus lots are now wanting videos that play on load which is an even bigger pain.

Tracy’s last blog post..Using A Child Locator Device Instead of Chipping Our Children

Reply

caitlin from uk web hosting May 22, 2009 at 3:34 am

I agree with your entire post. A Flash intro is a good option for people who really want Flash on their site. It’s hard to explain to clients exactly why Flash, music, and video can hurt their site, because they think it can only make their site stand out from others. In time, I think more people will download the necessary plugins for Flash and that no will longer be as much of an issue. However, I seriously doubt there will ever come a time when people don’t get irritated by music and videos that start playing as soon as a site loads.

Reply

Adam Singer March 31, 2009 at 9:08 am

Twitter: @adamsinger

Agreed 100%. Avoid flash at all costs…

Reply

Tyler March 31, 2009 at 9:16 am

This argument is tired. Serious Flash developers and Flash shops develop sites that are SEO-friendly (using SWFObjet), especially now that Google indexes Flash: http://tinyurl.com/a8f9eg and I can cite several more articles about SEO-ing Flash sites (http://tinyurl.com/dyg6yp, http://tinyurl.com/c6o5j8).

Your other claims are a reach:

Flash Player, though a plugin, is nearly ubiquitous, installed on nearly 99% of computers in the world. (http://www.adobe.com/products/player_census/flashplayer/version_penetration.html , http://www.riastats.com/).

I do agree that an HTML options should be made available for mobile phones, especially given the growing mobile audience.

Administrative Accessibility: If this is a concern, there are several Flash CMS systems that exist and work quite well. If a site is developed properly, it should be as easy as changing the text in a few XML files.

Poor user experience is a result of a bad designer, information architect or software developer, not of the technology itself.

Reply

MikeTek March 31, 2009 at 9:42 am

Twitter: @MikeTek

Sounds like somebody is a Flash designer. ;)

I don’t think an argument is tired until it’s been widely accepted.

Flash has its place, and it can make the web an incredibly interactive experience. But if you’ve done your research you know that the fact that Google is now crawling some Flash has alleviated hardly any of the problems of this medium from an SEO standpoint.

Take, for example, a website that was built entirely in Flash and loads a single .swf file. That means there’s one page to index, no way to bookmark a page within the site, etc.

I agree that it depends largely on the developer – a Flash site that is SEO-friendly is not an impossibility. The problem is that most Flash designers (and clients for that matter) don’t understand Flash replacement and other SEO-friendly Flash techniques well-enough, if they’re aware of them at all.

So I agree – it’s not the technology itself (while every technology does have its limitations). There are ways around the limitations, but most businesses and developers haven’t built these techniques into their budgets.

MikeTek’s last blog post..On Web Marketing & Low-cost Outsourcing

Reply

growmap March 31, 2009 at 9:52 am

Twitter: @GrowMap

@Mike Thank you for taking the time to comment on this very important issue that obviously still generates much debate. I do hope business owners will listen to those who see the big picture instead of developers who love Flash so much they ignore the drawbacks.

@Web Design Bureau We appreciate you reinforcing what we have posted here. Business owners do need to know the pros AND cons before they make important decisions like this.

@Tracy You are doing your clients a service by getting them to listen to your recommendations. I know that many business owners do find Flash appealing and it is easier for Web Designers to give in than it is to educate.

@Adam Singer I know I’ve done my job here when I solicit a comment from you. For those reading this who don’t know, Adam has one of the best and most read blogs around. I encourage you to read and subscribe to it.

@Tyler I encourage you to use the link to FlashBlockPro, go to one of your favorite sites, and see what we see. Then come back and tell me about our poor user experience being because of a bad designer and not limitations beyond the control of the users who experience THAT.

Point by point I will refute your claims here:

First, there are many more search engines besides Google and NONE of the others index Flash. Every business is already at risk because they get too much of their traffic and generate a far too large percentage of sales from Google.

Second, “installed on” and “used on” are two different things. Flash may be ON those computers but it is not being used on a significant percentage because the users have blocked it because:

1) They don’t like auto-playing files
2) They have to pay by the minute or by the amount of bandwidth they use
3) The only high speed Internet access available to them is satellite and the penalty for exceeding your allotted bandwidth usage is 24 hours without Internet access.

Even though we pay double to mitigate that damage we still can not allow sites to auto-play Flash files. To see them we have to click on EACH blocked Flash item individually and WAIT for it to load.

Seriously, visit some of your favorite Flash sites using FlashBlockPro to get a feel for that great user experience and do let us know how much you enjoy them that way.

I wish some non-technical business owners would comment on how easy they would find “changing the text in a few XML files”. Also note that in order for them to do that they have to install a Flash CMS. How many Flash sites today are already in a Flash CMS?

Here is the bottom line. In order to decide on building a business site that uses Flash predominantly or exclusively, the business owner must be willing to give up all potential buyers who:

1) Have older PCs that struggle with Flash
2) Do not have high speed access which is STILL not available in many areas of the U.S. today
3) Have vision issues that require them to be able to resize what they see
4) Have hearing issues that make audio difficult to understand or hear
5) Have any other issues related to using computers or that require special devices to adjust what they visit.
6) ALL mobile devices
7) Visitors who prefer to read or do not wish to wait for Flash to load. That wait is long enough to make many just click away.

Reply

John March 31, 2009 at 10:13 am

Speed, speed, and productivity! I worked for a website with a backend UI built out of flash and the work basically amounted to research and data entry. So when the interface went from HTML to Flash, I found myself spending more time waiting than actually accomplishing tasks. A five second fix might involve 15 to 30 seconds of downtime – and the longer the browser stayed open the worse the wait. Sure, it looked nice … but thats not a very practical benefit (especially for admin functions!)

John’s last blog post..10 Min Email

Reply

Tyler March 31, 2009 at 10:49 am

Google holds 72% market share in the US alone. In Belgium, they hold 96%. (http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2009/03/googles-market-share-in-your-country.html) So you can talk about the fact that there are other search engines, but who is using them? Yahoo, the in second place, is struggling to stay alive.

Flashblock… So, your poor user experience is the result of another plugin that YOU installed, not Flash. You are contradicting yourself. On Mozilla, Flashblock has been downloaded 6,160,256 times. 6.1 million / 202 million internet users in the US = 3%. That means that instead of Flash is still available on roughly 96% of all computers.

Internet bandwidth… We’re not in 1997 anymore. According to PEW, only 9% of Americans had dialup in 2008. ( http://www.pewinternet.org/Media-Mentions/2009/Recession-could-lengthen-the-twilight-of-dialup.aspx ) Obviously, if I were developing a site for a small, local business in an area that doesn’t have broadband access, I would certainly think twice about a Flash site. But, for any business that has a national or regional (in the US) target audience, this is most likely a non-issue.

Again, a good designer will take into account their audience and allow for text sizing for readability, audio issues, etc. should the site’s audience require those features. With good planning, all of these drawbacks can be avoided.

Reply

InternetStrategist from GrowMap.com March 31, 2009 at 11:40 am

Twitter: @GrowMap

@MikeTek Thank you for adding more detail on the SEO perspective. My latest comment (above) should clarify many more of the issues.

@John Yes, that is another thing about Flash – it simply is not as fast to load as static pages / html. I also prefer functional over pretty but slower.

I want to mention that John has posts about building Websites at the link in his comment above. John, we encourage comments including relevant links. Any time you have related material do feel free to share the link in the comments. I often move these up into the main posts.

You may have noticed that we are dofollow and have KeywordLuv and CommentLuv installed. Next time you leave a comment you can use John@WebDesign or John@WebsiteBuildingBiz to provide your own anchor text for your links.

InternetStrategist’s last blog post..Blog Traffic Up 54.87% in the Last 30 Days: Our Proven Traffic Improvement Strategy

Reply

Tyler March 31, 2009 at 12:09 pm

Yeah, I wouldn’t post my comments either if I were you.

Reply

growmap March 31, 2009 at 1:50 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

@Tyler I don’t understand your last comment. I will go check to see if Akismet captured another comment from you. Ah yes, there it is. I have approved it and will reply again after I read it. Akismet tends to capture any comment that includes links and I have to manually approve them.

growmap’s last blog post..Promote Your Business Without Cash

Reply

growmap March 31, 2009 at 2:07 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

@Tyler Yes, Google holds a dangerously high monopolistic amount of market share. What that means is that every business is at their mercy. That is an even larger reason to find other methods of bringing traffic to a business. We need MORE other search engine traffic – not NO other search engines!

I do not use Flashblock – I offered that so you could experience exactly what many Internet users see when they visit sites you really think are great.

Flash sites are nearly useless for me because, as I stated before, the only high speed access available to me is satellite and HughesNet has severe bandwidth limits. Since I work online exceeding those limits and having NO Internet access at all for 24 hours at a time is simply not an option.

Designers tend to have powerful PCs attached to the very best access but the customers of their clients do NOT. While a designer can simply choose to dismiss any potential visitor who doesn’t choose to live in the city and own the latest and greatest technology that is NOT such a great idea for businesses.

Even the wealthiest golfers do not all live in the city. There ARE upscale 6000 square foot homes near golf courses in rural areas of the U.S. where high speed Internet access is provided either by satellite or local small wireless companies.

Every golfer is not a techie and neither is every potential buyer for the products and services of any business with a Web site. Just because someone has cash to spend on what that business offers does NOT imply that they own a newer PC and have high speed access.

I wonder if those businesses know that eliminating 9% of their potential market (to use just your example of how many still use dial-up) right off the top will agree that this is “likely a non-issue”. You’re going to dismiss all those other issues too?

I challenge you to provide some examples of Flash sites that allow for text sizing, readability, search-ability or audio issues. Yes, I threw an extra issue in there: the ability to search a site and locate what I want. Show me a site that provides a way to search Flash content.

Let’s say I want to buy a particular brand or model golf club. How much can I find about it on a golf manufacturer’s site that uses Flash versus how much can I almost instantly access on one that is NOT Flash.

I know designers have no qualms about dismissing Internet users who don’t happen to have hardware and access equivalent to theirs. I seriously doubt they tell their clients up front that they are planning to intentionally ignore X percent of their buying market. That is why I am telling them.

Many sites work great in the Corporate office on the T-1 line. Decision makers in those companies should visit their site while visiting friends, family and neighbors and see what they look like out in the real world where THEIR potential buyers function.

Reply

spot from nikon March 31, 2009 at 4:11 pm

Twitter: @SpotCoolStuff

I agree with this totally!

However . . . here’s something I’ve noticed. My 7 year old daughter (who is almost 8, as I’m constantly reminded) has become quite the internet surfer over the last few months. One of the things I’ve noticed about the site she and her friends visit is that they are ALL in flash. Every single one.

Do you have any theories on why that might be?

Perhaps SEO isn’t as important for kid-oriented sites (because kids (or at least my daughter) doesn’tuse Google). But also, maybe there’s something about flash that makes sites easier to use.

spot’s last blog post..Nikon D80 vs D90 vs D300

Reply

Florian78 June 19, 2009 at 12:59 pm

Thats probably because she mainly plays browser games, which are -naturally- in flash.

Reply

InternetStrategist from GrowMap.com March 31, 2009 at 4:20 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

@Spot from Nikon There are many ways to get to sites so the first question is how does she get to the sites she uses. I suspect they’re linked from where she started and she is reaching sites from links from other favorite sites.

There is less competition for kid’s sites in search engines too and search engines are not the ONLY way to find sites. High profile sites with television coverage for example would get a lot of traffic even if they weren’t listed in search engines – but not as much as they would if they are.

I am sincerely hoping that Internet users do find other ways to find sites. It can not happen soon enough. I am seriously concerned for businesses that get almost all their visitors and buyers from Google – and today that is probably most of them.

If Google’s system drops them suddenly traffic will drop to almost nothing and so will their revenues. I have seen that happen and it is not pretty. Not only that – getting that traffic back will take too long – IF it even happens and many businesses would be closed by then.

InternetStrategist’s last blog post..Don’t Make ANY Changes Based on Web Analytics Until You READ THIS FIRST

Reply

Matt from Sacramento Weddings April 1, 2009 at 11:35 am

I love Flash, because nearly all my competitors love using it, and then they wonder why Google doesn’t index or crawl their pages. (LOL)

Reply

InternetStrategist from GrowMap.com April 1, 2009 at 12:10 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

@Matt ROFLOL That is the best sound bite I’ve ever heard about Flash. Thank you! I’m going to Twitter it. Although Google does now index Flash if their Flash is one large file there is far less SEO benefit.

As MikeTek said in his comment above, “a website that was built entirely in Flash and loads a single .swf file. That means there’s one page to index, no way to bookmark a page within the site, etc.”

The best way to be found online is to have a separate page for every single keyword phrase you wish to target – one large file = very few individual search listings.

It also means no one can share a specific page on Twitter, FriendFeed, StumbleUpon, Google Reader or any other major Social Networking or bookmarking site! They also can not send a page or product to their friends and family any other way either.

I share hundreds of pages across multiple Social Networking sites and in other blogs every day and none of them are going to be Flash. Check out the older post I’ve linked to the main URL (not the CommentLuv link) in this post for how far one action can travel.

InternetStrategist’s last blog post..The Serious Drawbacks to Using FLASH for Web Design: Usability, SEO, Editability

Reply

Roxy April 2, 2009 at 8:41 am

Great post. I wish all our demanding business clients would take heed. Many have been completely hypnotised into thinking that Flash is the future – some have even been told how Flash is no barrier to SEO.

Reply

Dennis Edell April 2, 2009 at 10:41 am

Twitter: @DennisEdell

Hello 1990’s web building.

Dennis Edell’s last blog post..Opening INTERNAL Links- New Window or Same Window?

Reply

InternetStrategist from GrowMap.com April 2, 2009 at 11:33 am

Twitter: @GrowMap

@Roxy Many Flash designers truly BELIEVE that “Flash is no barrier to SEO” – unfortunately they don’t know anything ABOUT SEO so it is easier for them to keep believing that. It can easily be proven and I have been considering taking the time to do just that.

I’m going to edit this post to add a solution for you. Check the very end under “What to Do When Your Clients Insist on Using Flash”.

@Dennis LOL I’m not sure exactly what you mean; however, I am certain that the myth that since Google indexes Flash now all is fine SEO-wise will increase the number of sites making this critical mistake.

InternetStrategist’s last blog post..Blog Traffic Up 54.87% in the Last 30 Days: Our Proven Traffic Improvement Strategy

Reply

James King April 2, 2009 at 3:44 pm

Hi,

An excellent post, I wanted to share this post with my readers, so I’ve added this to my weekly link love.

http://www.atmmultimedia.com/link-love-week-3/

James King’s last blog post..Link Love – Week 3

Reply

Dennis Edell April 2, 2009 at 3:44 pm

Twitter: @DennisEdell

Ah the 90’s, that was a time. You were hard-pressed to find a site NOT built flash style.

Dennis Edell’s last blog post..Opening INTERNAL Links- New Window or Same Window?

Reply

growmap April 2, 2009 at 7:37 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

@James King I am glad you liked it and thank you for sharing us with your readers. I visited your blog and noticed several posts that would be additional resources here. When I get some time I will add links to them from the related information here.

We are a dofollow blog so feel free to add any related posts you have in the comments here. I periodically move them up into the body of posts.

@Dennis I have pretty much always just clicked away so I don’t recall them being worse back then. I built my first Web sites in the mid to late ’90s on a T-1 line and even then I wasn’t fond of Flash.

Reply

LogicalExtremes April 2, 2009 at 10:31 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

Comment originally posted at FriendFeed:

My main additional issues with Flash and Silverlight and their ilk are: 1. proprietary; 2. persistent data (cookies) that few know exists and how to manage. It’s amazing what can be done without it… http://www.dhteumeuleu.com/

LogicalExtremes’s last blog post..Surveillance via Neighbors

Reply

Andrew Smith April 2, 2009 at 10:33 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

I don’t want to really get into a huge debate but Flash is not bad. It’s a tool that can be used or abused. Most arguments against Flash can be solved by the designer (except the proprietary one). Alternative content “under” Flash make the content accessible, search friendly etc. XML used to easily update and there is currently no better video delivery method period.

Reply

InternetStrategist from GrowMap April 2, 2009 at 10:33 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

Flash is great when you want to run a video. It is NOT great for creating searchable, indexable content – or even VIEWable content for those who don’t have powerful computers and non-satellite high-speed access.

InternetStrategist’s last blog post..Who Are My Readers? Are You Getting Benefits From What You Read Here?

Reply

RobMichael from Muso April 2, 2009 at 10:35 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

I’ve taken direct measures to eliminate flash from my site for the above reasons. Fortunately, the content of my flash-based widgets can be brought into the site via RSS.

RobMichael’s last blog post..Olive & Vine w/ Cliff & Cynthia

Reply

Dennis Edell April 3, 2009 at 1:34 pm

Twitter: @DennisEdell

I built my first Web sites in the mid to late ’90s on a T-1 line…

Must be nice to be wealthy. LOL

Dennis Edell’s last blog post..UPDATED! Opening INTERNAL Links- New Window or Same Window?

Reply

Derek April 4, 2009 at 1:19 pm

Twitter: @dereksemmler

The use of Flash on most sites reminds me of the hideous use of the “blink” tag back in the day. Ugh!

Derek’s last blog post..Happy Birthday, Derek Semmler dot com!

Reply

David from SEM Labs April 4, 2009 at 6:11 pm

Yeah. Flash is not a good idea to make a full site in. Having some elements in flash can be ok though. However, Google is getting quite good at dealing with this. I think Google have even started reading vector files and I know they are also OCRing PDFs that are just images.

David’s last blog post..Free Fluid WordPress Themes and CSS Templates

Reply

electric push bikes April 6, 2009 at 12:19 am

Thanks for the drawbacks its really helpful for me for using or selecting the tools for making my site.

Reply

Internet Strategist April 6, 2009 at 3:53 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

@RobMichael You’ll get better traffic and lower bounce rates for having done so. I’m not against all Flash – it has proper uses such as videos. It just is not a good idea for entire sites or the majority of the content on an information or store site.

@Derek Yes, you’re right. It also reminds me of sites that had multiple twirling animated images and the banners with text that slid back and forth.

@David True. It really worries me that Google seems to be the only consideration for more and more people. I’m working on a new post right now that shows the serious danger that has created.

Internet Strategist’s last blog post..Blog Traffic Up 54.87% in the Last 30 Days: Our Proven Traffic Improvement Strategy

Reply

Rein Valdez April 8, 2009 at 1:54 am

Very informative post! Exactly the things to be considered by a webmasters if incorporating a flash in a website project. :)

Great man!

Rein Valdez’s last blog post..Happy Reality and Facts

Reply

InternetStrategist from GrowMap April 9, 2009 at 1:58 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

@Rein Thank you. I hope you noticed the book I recommended by Steve Krug. It is a great way to dissuade those who THINK they want a totally Flash site or Flash Intro.

InternetStrategist’s last blog post..Why You Can NOT Rely Solely on Organic Search Listings for Traffic and Revenue

Reply

InternetStrategist from GrowMap April 9, 2009 at 11:04 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

@Dennis I remembered this comment but missed it last round. LOL I have never been rich. I had a friend who built his own ISP and I built that site using a PC in his spare office.

I spent hours after work every day adding pages. There was so much quality content that Yahoo! added a new directory category for it and it made $400 in AdSense a month. I never could have built a site that big without fast access and dedicated time.

InternetStrategist’s last blog post..Blog Traffic Up 54.87% in the Last 30 Days: Our Proven Traffic Improvement Strategy

Reply

web design and development April 27, 2009 at 7:38 am

i think flash should be used in an adequate manner because where it is not useful for searches at the same time visitors peers for flash contents in the web pages so it should be used fairly.

Reply

InternetStrategist from GrowMap April 28, 2009 at 3:00 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

Flash can be great for videos; it just is not the best way to display an entire Web site or anything your visitors may wish to search for instead of watch. Even if I didn’t have to put up with the download limits of satellite Internet I don’t have time to watch long videos to find what I want.

Sites that offer products and services are greatly decreasing their potential conversions. Busy Internet users want to quickly find exactly what they’re seeking – and Flash is not the way to make that happen.

InternetStrategist’s last blog post..WordPress 2.7 Threaded Comments Works In Thesis

Reply

Chris from electronic components April 28, 2009 at 4:08 pm

I can’t tell you the countless times friends and coworkers of mine wanted a flash site. HOWEVER! I have that having a link that points to the flash version and the html version is a smart alternative if you really do want a flash site.

I still love flash though.

Reply

InternetStrategist from GrowMap April 28, 2009 at 5:02 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

As long as there is also an html version AND you provide a way to bypass it immediately there is no problem using Flash. I can’t tell you how many times businesses have had sites built that would not work on older PCs or slower Internet connections.

Those who build sites have an obligation to explain the issues involved to their clients BEFORE they accept the work. At least suggest they read Steve Krug’s book Don’t Make Me Think. He explains the issues clearly.

InternetStrategist’s last blog post..WordPress 2.7 Threaded Comments Works In Thesis

Reply

Garden Sheds May 5, 2009 at 6:33 pm

Interesting thoughts on Flash, very helpful for a slow learner and will be a more informed user in the future!
Regards Penelope

Reply

InternetStrategist from GrowMap.com May 6, 2009 at 9:33 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

Welcome Penelope. There is much more here for you to learn, especially the information on increasing traffic through proven free methods and how to increase conversions through improved usability and copywriting.

InternetStrategist’s last blog post..How to Create a Successful Blog Based Business Part 1

Reply

Johnson from Professional Web Design May 29, 2009 at 8:41 am

Web developers enjoy creating sites with flash, and clients think it looks flash!!

That’s the main reason why so many use it. They don’t think about the major drawbacks. As more people realise it’s a bad idea its usage will decrease dramatically.

Reply

Internet Strategist from GrowMap June 13, 2009 at 7:35 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

Hi Johnson,

That is why I recommend Steve Krug’s great book Don’t Make Me Think. It helps business owners and anyone involved in designing a Web site understand how specific design elements affect usability.

Reply

Creative lounge May 31, 2009 at 5:11 am

Web sites for search engines or web sites for human? I accept Flash has it own drawback when it comes to SEO, i used to be a flash developer in my early career but i am more into php+mysql now.

Sorry i could not read all the comments, i hate reading large text pages. It is the content of the site that makes it popular not SEO. You need SEO if you are selling shoes, you do not need SEO if you are a company like Ford and selling Mustang ( http://www.fordvehicles.com/the2010mustang / ) .

@Tracy
You are probably unaware about XML driven dynamic Photo galleries like
flashden.net/item/fullscreen-gallery-xml-driven/full_screen_preview/43376 .

Reply

Internet Strategist from GrowMap June 13, 2009 at 7:38 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

Hi Creative,

I agree that Web design must first be about the user. I may have more objections to Flash because I am a wordsmith and do a lot of searches when researching a subject. Anything in Flash is usually unsearchable so it is as if that content did not even exist.

Some people (like me) prefer to read; others (often designers) prefer multi-media presentations. The readers of my blog are more likely to be thinkers and readers than designers. You are the second person recently who prefers images to words. The other is a specialist in logo design.

Reply

Yash from Child support attorney June 10, 2009 at 3:06 am

Twitter: @SNVINFOTECH

Hi,
It just is not the best way to display an entire Web site or anything your visitors may wish to search for instead of watch. Those who build sites have an obligation to explain the issues involved to their clients BEFORE they accept the work.
Thanks.

Reply

Internet Strategist from GrowMap June 13, 2009 at 7:39 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

Hello Yash,

Yes, designers should always explain the pros and cons before they accept the work. I suspect though that many don’t know what they are.

Reply

Ray from Sunshine coast web design June 11, 2009 at 5:23 am

Hi,
Very nice post.If you use lot of flash in your site and the content in your site minimum than it is difficult that your site rank high in the Google.Because content is king according the Google. Thanks for the sharing

Ray’s last blog post..Brisbane Logo Design: When Change is Necessary

Reply

Internet Strategist from GrowMap June 13, 2009 at 11:26 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

Welcome Ray,

Yes, I agree and not just for search engines. It is also important to visitors who want to search your site.

Reply

Nick from Flash Development June 12, 2009 at 12:19 pm

Twitter: @DKS_Systems

Flash can be amazing, a lot of really cool designs can be made with it too! Unfortunately because of the search engines not being able to read it or index it we don’t opt to use it much anymore… that is unless we decide were ok with something not being recognized by the SE.

Reply

Internet Strategist from GrowMap June 13, 2009 at 11:27 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

Hi Nick,

Flash is great for creating some content – just not for important information that needs to be searched. Ideally a great site could use both. Some people like to view video; others like to read. It is always wise to cater to both.

Reply

katie from offshore outsourcing June 13, 2009 at 12:22 am

As far as there is no concern in SEO, flash can be used to the hilt. Excellent stuff indeed!

Reply

Internet Strategist from GrowMap June 19, 2009 at 2:16 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

I totally disagree unless all the content in Flash is also provided in text. Those with older PCs, slower Internet connections, or bandwidth limits will not view Flash files. Researchers and those who build reference sites will not find what is hidden in Flash so those sites attract far fewer incoming links.

Internet Strategist’s last blog post..How to Add Your Free Business Listing to infoUSA

Reply

Manop from Canon PowerShot Digital Cameras June 16, 2009 at 10:51 pm

Wow! I don’t use flash in my sites because I know that search engines’ bots can’t understand them. However, I expect that those bots may read flash in the near future. By the way, I didn’t know that there are many bad drawbacks like you mentioned. Thanks for the post.

Reply

Internet Strategist from GrowMap June 19, 2009 at 2:20 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

Hello Manop,

Google claims they can read some Flash and it is possible to make Flash more search engine friendly. It still has all these other issues though so it is best used for entertainment, games, or short movies.

Internet Strategist’s last blog post..How to Create a Successful Blog Based Business Part 1

Reply

hard drive repair June 20, 2009 at 7:43 pm

I just learn web design from early had not like flash because one reason such as you told it does not work at all on all system and must be manually loaded on others

hard drive repair’s last blog post..Speed Up Computer

Reply

Razoze June 28, 2009 at 7:10 am

Flash is not good in SEO
.-= Razoze´s last blog ..Need Those Sales? Exploit the Search Engines This Way First =-.

Reply

Andy from Infrastructure Outsourcing June 29, 2009 at 1:22 am

Twitter: @marketraise

Flash sites mainly focuses on images and very little on the text.Earlier search engines were not able to index flash sites as bots required content or text to crawl them.But it is said as of now, that search engines do crawl and index Adobe Flash based sites,if HTML pages of these Flash Pages are created.
From SEO point of view,the basic elements such as Anchor Texts,Heading tags,image alt tags are all very much complicated or sometimes ignored while implementing with Flash.

Reply

Internet Strategist from GrowMap September 27, 2009 at 10:24 pm

Twitter: @GrowMap

Many Web Designers lack SEO knowledge and that is true whether they are using Flash or not. It is unfortunate that businesses don’t really know how to evaluate Web Development companies.
.-= Internet Strategist @GrowMap´s last blog ..Instantly Acquire 76 High Quality Incoming Links =-.

Reply

fta files July 16, 2009 at 11:29 pm

Twitter: @c

I expect that those bots may read flash in the near future. By the way, I didn’t know that there are many bad drawbacks like you mentioned. Thanks for the post.

Reply

ishu from listen to music July 22, 2009 at 5:18 pm

Still too new, will wait and see
Thanks for the info, it’s good to have another source of cheap traffic :)
Thanks again.
Good Luck

Reply

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv Enabled

This site uses KeywordLuv. Enter YourName@YourKeywords in the Name field to take advantage.

{ 7 trackbacks }

Previous post: TwtPoll 2: What Local Search Directories Do You Use to Locate Products and Services?

Next post: Do YOUR Blogging Goals Include Monetization: Benefits Our Readers Receive